The example used by Gettier in his paper is a bit confusing. The Gettier Problem. endobj This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. Therefore people look for similar yet simpler examples to better understand this problem. What the gettier paper shows is that the theory that knowledge is justified true belief is wrong. The Philosophical Life 383 views This definition, which dates to Plato, was challenged … In diesem Aufsatz formulierte er das so genannte Gettier-Problem. First, in that sense of 'justified' in which S's being justified in believing P is a necessary condition of S's knowing that P, it is possible for a person to be justified in believing a proposition that is in fact false Secondly, for any proposition P, if S is justified in believing P, and P entails Q, and S deduces Q from P and accepts Q as a result of this deduction, then S is justified in believing Q. Gettier argues that it is possible to have a justified true belief without knowledge, then the JTB (justified true belief) analysis would be wrong. There are many scenarios in which the conditions for justified true belief are met but cannot be said to qualify as knowledge; therefore justified true belief is not a sufficient definition for knowledge. The attempts have often been such that they can be stated in a form similar to the following: 1. a. The Impact Of Multifamily Residential On Real Estate Market, Human Resource Management : An Effective Teacher And Hr Practitioners. Various attempts have been made in recent years to state necessary and sufficient conditions for someone's knowing a given proposition. H�tT]o�0}ϯ�ۺ����Tu*�Nl��J�4mӔ� �J’Ў���|8 ����s�=��2ͣ����|�v!��C���p4J����0bKF�����h|E�?V�R|꺌ۺ�K��@��5�n'�'kr���ǂ��j:�s5KŐ�- �F�5��#@���T������_�������� /� ��P-�$� ���uvy{9�2���k�WI��)W� ��H8�'���GD��o��!jr.ݚ�1D�����v���/n'�l���ʩPJ�,�:�F��O0~�d\Ȳk�U=s�B^"����*�f ̮�TA ���w�z��{���d܀9+m���-�3�~Q5Ω��F��tr]�QF��z������d�n�����h�Oæu�|��i\�E)�Q�E�`�B�~|�N� �)е�u0���*�U��w�y�ŨT��ynwyV�:G��1$?�0n�P�e9S�:`��P���0�/cϱ$�OB?�z�xlU����6���þLN3�Kg��Z� �c���V/��0gƦl�ZEAd�C�����$^Fy�č�Z�M�m�[%i_%�"u�d&q�*�NJ��8y��u����oq�3�u�X�S�]�쒬L{��h��hS��0�������RG�J�fL�*?Mj�MM��B-4��^眂k��7~ލ�nno� �%���*6Tpe�FQ�V4V��[E�D�\�Π���؈���E����Cm�?=� ��_�NU���4}�c�q�P��2eo���h�C��+��` ���X H��U�N�@��+�A�fz� q�%q@B�G���L�Y�A8,��o{�vb�(�H3�]�U�c���/�.Yt�D� ��Y���"���Z1S!�βd-��;J^��$�����i���N�.o��>\�GT,ybc�@j;�x�y��Ɔ��e��]l?���+&� �������a��ᠵ� ݇�*g�I Edmund Gettier musste in den 1960er Jahren eine Veröffentlichung vorlegen, um seinen Arbeitsplatz als Philosophiedozent behalten zu dürfen: Er schrieb daraufhin einen kurzen Artikel, der bis heute zu den am meisten diskutierten philosophischen Aufsätzen überhaupt gehört. In: Analy-sis 23 (1963) Nr. Edmund L. Gettier III is an American philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Edmund Gettier's Is justified true Belief Knowledge? For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. 6 0 obj <>stream Edmund Gettier Från Wikipedia Edmund Gettier , född 1927 i ... Epistemoloji bilgi nazariyesinin ( kuramının ) yetersizliği 1963 ' de Edmund Gettier tarafından kanıtlanmıştır . S. 121–123. According to Gettier, Plato’s theory does not define knowledge, because trust, belief and justification can be satisfied, but still these conditions do not led to knowledge. by Edmund L Gettier ( Book ) 1 edition published in 2017 in English and held by 1 WorldCat member library worldwide For 2,000 years, the standard philosophical model of knowledge was that it could be defined as a justified true belief. Also, Hume questioned, In Edmund L. Gettier’s essay “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Gettier argues that there are instances in which p is true, S believes that p, and S is justified in believing that p, yet S still does not know p. In arguing this, Gettier is stating that having Justified True Belief is not sufficient for having knowledge. Keeping these two points … Edmund L. Gettier: Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund L. Gettier III (/ ˈ ɡ ɛ t i ər /; born October 31, 1927) is an American philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.He is best known for his short 1963 article "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? endobj 4 0 obj <>stream Diese definiert Wissen als Meinung (Überzeugung), die gerechtfertigt und wahr ist. He was educated at Cornell University by Norman Malcolm and Max Black. The second will describe a number of attempts to fix the Gettier problem from a variety of angles, and the third will briefly address the broader question of why this subject has proven so seemingly intractable. Gettier challenged the definition of knowledge as "justified true belief," thought to have been accepted since Plato. Gettier is one of the first to challenge the tripartite structure of ‘justified-true-belief’, arguing there are instances in which an individual could have a true belief, this true belief is justified, and given all that, the individual still fails to acquire any knowledge. But our intuition says no the person did not have knowledge in either case so the theory needs to be modified in some way. (Is Justified True Belief Knowledg). Wählen Sie Ihre Cookie-Einstellungen. In Plato’s Theaetetus, the dialog between Socrates and his student, Theaetetus, sets up the argument that knowledge is true belief that is adequately justified. The Macat Library: Amazon.de: Schukraft, Jason: Bücher. Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Darin erschüttert Gettier die These, Wissen sei gerechtfertigte, wahre Überzeugung. The Gettier Problem. Loading... Unsubscribe from BlueSpectacles? S is justified in believing P (Plato’s big contribution) Justificat ion Truth This is accepted as what knowledge is for almost 2,400 years (through Aristotle, Descartes, Kant, etc…until a man from Detroit (my school Wayne state university) showed it to be wrong. [1^`J4nThU#W4%BYk!s\!jk2NT1G/9-T,BhM^cJ=m01N[,C95OHggGrH-pmB@1HsY.Sc*XNW.HtI-mKX"7>"QFkCZf0s"$NMK(uh2X-OZ6-,d$XbRfQuW-CE&CRsH)^/BD,r4E+=go0i3/I08SC]QUfARpVt*.MOHODbRs%;Gbf0NFKA`r_o,OF'TQf#-YZ3kX/!WVL]]03HWi\D`s/3d8b9%A+nsY;M3J4H2:%mMY!DA3/\(DI\N8s&?mdc.OXh:2Ce,ccSGUHf1F\%iDCjg/L19MnYtPMGl0d+\".HN/a2K">Po_'s6PB1E4>Vbe^`3FUlQr('hc+3/&&Su9)XS(YLN1&&U;8G\AAGUd:GN#8&MC.X8g]JE@&BWX/i91]&2u,e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#"T8^E.F;)~> BlueSpectacles. Gettier shows, by means of two counterexamples, that there are cases where individuals had justified the true belief of a claim but still failed to know it; thus, he claimed to have shown that the JTB account is inadequate and can not account for all of the knowledge Der berühmte Aufsatz von Edmund L. Gettier „Is justified true belief knowledge? Because Gettier's criticism of the Justified True Belief model is systemic, a cottage industry has sprung up around imagining increasingly fantastical counterexamples. In dangerous Gettier cases the lucky occurrence functions as an unseen threat to the subjects having a justified true belief. For the philosopher Plato, justification, belief and trust defines knowledge. 8 0 obj<> ", which has generated an extensive philosophical literature trying to respond to what became known as the Gettier problem. So condition explains why it isn’t knowledge. And despite being created over half a century ago, it still has its applications and continues to rock the world of epistemology, logic, the philosophy of science. JTB has historically defined the important equation that knowledge can be conceptually deciphered through the subjective belief of an individual. However, Gettier’s problem defines the limitation of belief, which can, epistemic closure purports that we are justified in believing that our logical inferences are true. Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, Gettier-type counterexamples (called "Gettier-cases") challenge the long-held justified true belief … Edmund L. Gettier Une croyance vraie et justifiée est-elle une connaissance ? Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 1.79K. Transcribed into hypertext by Andrew Chrucky, Sept. 13, 1997. » [1], Edmund Gettier affirme qu'il existe des situations dans lesquelles une croyance peut être à la fois vraie et justifiée, et ne constitue pas pour autant une connaissance. What the gettier paper shows is that the theory that knowledge is justified true belief is wrong. Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Propositional knowledge should be distinguished from knowledge of acquaintance, as obtains when Su… Loading... Unsubscribe from BlueSpectacles? An Analysis of Edmund Gettier's Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Cancel Unsubscribe. Gettier argues that it is possible to have a justified true belief without knowledge, then the JTB (justified true belief) analysis would be wrong. He is best known for his short 1963 paper, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?," which generated an enormous philosophical literature trying to … Edmund Gettier made the following two assumptions: 1) b is a justified, true belief (JTB-definition of knowledge) 2) b is not knowledge And therefore, JTB theory is false. Dans son célèbre article de 1963 intitulé « Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? That's what's doing showing a theory is inadequate, by showing through the two case examples that according to the JTB theory the person would have knowledge. JTB has historically defined the important equation that knowledge can be conceptually deciphered through the subjective belief of an individual. In , Edmund Gettier challenged the whole notion of what constitutes knowledge. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. �գ�؀�nB���M�*��KHF:9�.k��� 3! Edmund L. Gettier zeigte in einem nur dreiseitigen Aufsatz von 1963, dass diese Auffassung von Wissen doch nicht alles abdeckt und somit zu kurz kommt. 13 0 obj<>>> Gettier is correct in arguing that knowledge is relative, and nobody can claim to know everything about something. J. Dutant 2003. This is the golden – the fiftieth – anniversary of Edmund Gettier’s remarkable paper on why knowledge isn’t justified true belief. The Gettier problem and counter-examples enable people to understand that the standard account of knowledge as a justified true belief is not refutable. Edmund Gettier- Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? justified true belief (JBT) and the Gettier and Gettier-style objections to it. Gettier Cases: How They Demolished the Justified True Belief Theory of Knowledge - Duration: 18:03. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? true, even though (i) (h) is true, (ii) Smith does believe that (h) is true, and (iii) Smith is justified in believing that (h) is true. *jfYeeVKu6CRO&'dE@ESs@"[UVuU/q+J/2Ltla,QitZJ@)gg-`Q+J,OfEH@n%h%$$XQ`K5Y2J](g<6,0iXA^d5D#S!o"*[C@Fc&]:VY6c>Y6)iPRip#!.Rs;dR!D5gAokO.r_.X%"@qEU*93Y7Q0tjZVU-mB>,WTR8eeXdPT[9Y\dQgnOT=AK'!^ZjL:4d;+\?L3"9BPeQbCKCYb"AQ4Ch$5q,K"""gl$+=L$WWQ7OU>3ldcA#t*'"[jAWZRlu5W'+m/u9l%5]*u&(b%+Mt-D?b;PkG1hiW.M`;)Q6VoJORTu't:;0ii-?Q##D)=&QS-464S!\iHc,kq4lYe\!-3to9U,;ea&FQj+KLd1ZuKg)J4I*(Yu(XVQ'N?h/Q!#>#N3:fk[ksHb?Y7AhnDFF;r1U;tmG)J>;n&)sCd-bn?aTY%0s9FO+4t!VMqjS;+a:=q$[`lc?YrAN[Q*iQ_WX8N%mP1?03;:&>/,&"CCY;3#8oRJ*Wj7**L#PIk^Hpa&"H7tsOIS_d0GF513Y_*;jb]=u~> However, this is circular reasoning. Gettier is correct in arguing that knowledge is relative, and nobody can claim to know everything about something. To support this argument, Gettier states Smith has strong evidence that Jones owns a Ford, but is completely unaware of where his friend Brown may be. Knowledge is a complex aspect that requires experience, contact, objectivity, and purpose to understand it. That's what's doing showing a theory is inadequate, by showing through the two case examples that according to the JTB theory the person would have knowledge. Edmund Gettier musste in den 1960er Jahren eine Veröffentlichung vorlegen, um seinen Arbeitsplatz als Philosophiedozent behalten zu dürfen: Er schrieb ein dreiseitiges Papier, das bis heute zu den am meisten diskutierten philosophischen Aufsätzen überhaupt gehört: Er erschütterte die damals weithin akzeptierte Position, Wissen sei gerechtfertigte, wahre Überzeugung. Gettier suggested that knowledge is more than trust, justification and belief. Trad. “1 hat eine jetzt schon über 50 Jahre andauernde fruchtbare Debatte über den Wissensbegriff mit vielen scharfsinnigen Erörterungen ausgelöst2. EDMUND GETTIER Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Or, ce que Jack ignore lui-même, c'est que son vrai prénom est Constant. 6. Ist gerechtfertigte, wahre Überzeugung Wissen? Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. endstream Edmund L. Gettier III (* 1927 in Baltimore, Maryland) ist ein US-amerikanischer Philosoph und emeritierter Professor an der University of Massachusetts Amherst.Er wurde vor allem durch einen dreiseitigen Aufsatz aus dem Jahre 1963 mit dem Titel Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? (EPUB), 106 S., 5,49 Euro. Gettier Problem Examples. 10 0 obj[11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R] Peut-on dire que Gwendolen, croyant que Jack s'appelle Constant, le savait? In Gettier’s cases, the justified true belief is inferred from a justified false belief. Edmund L. Gettier III is an American philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem concerning our understanding of descriptive knowledge. Knowledge is a complex aspect that requires experience, contact, objectivity, and purpose to understand it. Cases of this sort are now called "Gettier (counter-)examples." Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 1.79K. Bücher bei Weltbild.de: Jetzt Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? 12 0 obj<>>> Edmund L. Gettier III (born 1927, Baltimore, Maryland) is an American philosopher best known for the so-called Gettier problem in epistemology which he outlined in a 1963 paper in Analysis titled "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?". Nous pouvons dire que Gwendolen avait raison de le croire puisque c'est Jack qui le lui avait dit, et c'est une manière a… The problems are actual or possible situations in which someone has a belief that is both true and well supported by evidence, yet … Edmund Gettier, ameriški analitični filozof, * 31. oktober 1927, Baltimore, Maryland, Združene države Amerike.. Najbolj je znan po svojem članku, ki ga je napisal leta 1963, z naslovom Je védenje upravičeno resnično prepričanje? Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? endobj / Ist gerechtfertigte, wahre Überzeugung Wissen? If you’ve seen someone talk about the “Gettier Problem”, “Gettier Paper”, or the issue of Justified True Belief (JTB), then you’ve heard about the fantastic 1963 short paper written by Edmund Gettier. This short piece, published in , seemed to many decisively to refute an. Gau0C?#SIU'ReT:i/=iELhT`D$8?QrQ39dk[7f!M6e_iLAo+mgWKC/=m+7;=D!BBQP3$*XOAMaoHg`uX*\jRH2nMTm$*]JJ44!BpPb*r%*^RO=+Xd[Pa`E]b3VNCW'fGjYk"6_hBb5K,^U\6iiHLeDL8dMICj8!P'k_a.o6VY4'jE6BgEZ>"("Y?p\5-KK29d5pjD\lA:)7?iVi.,mR0"#aP1QmZOPVGMX3Vp1^@-j++:5AGOEDuHaX"r[E"]lX-K1ApglAP?MpqEanD#dOcTY+@dpPcjd9A.3Lc,_FS>P=OqbJIMBC7A^P[:dj0k%'e^f*=u\6_JkcbXY,!r*94lt4OR?#sKm__*U/hNr.=TuF0n. 11 0 obj<>>> By propositional knowledge, we mean knowledge of a propositionfor example, if Susan knows that Alyssa is a musician, she has knowledge of the proposition that Alyssa is a musician. Jetzt eBook herunterladen & mit Ihrem Tablet oder eBook Reader lesen. This principle has been used as the basis of various forms of skeptical arguments against the traditional analysis and inductive/deductive reasoning. [��PA������I�mrC���B+0j���Cb]�������9����‚Ն)��PH;z5�#�b��x'`�4���D Ҏ4��3��, g)62o)5Yp=D&Nf(2VjRVNeY[e^gR,#h8:dUa&3'e,4hJ+Js6>Anlj>S?aC8[qJ#*7GN]fc"#-)F/nG/5>RnD6u0C5U`DEif"'GV%`IN?A3=Cu_7IrVnYpj:]?\3(FP:=G]Z[;G1$X"X(K_-)ehlahDLa"8g[f"*-sWd1-lO=!s0,Af89s`_-8LfLi/8Gl5%C`sB4ZPFiAGnbS>8!Zib"_fD_Z?F>Bi`$pYW[;=$.kYTo/3mXkCFD+F$7L?s'E=?iei!O1b*D7KMW>D@nI`kC;"kCQd,[%o@O&Mn^_XhaUEN7q(/@\A&=msV;Ya8Nor@O7EZ31Z?5XSk2>_04'(Z^@pGiD]='r,81MW@UgCC-4#/WmCE!=j"40YC[jZ)7oF_dtr%@.=uLb/6#I/.%In1;ELJWB0tCU1=Y&D. 7 0 obj<> But our intuition says no the person did not have knowledge in either case so the theory needs to be modified in some way. endobj Edmund Gettier: "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? 16 0 obj <>stream According to this way of thinking, we can know, for example, that we are human because [1] we believe ourselves to be human; [2] that belief is justified (others treat us as humans, not as dogs); and [3] the belief is true. This short piece, published in , seemed to many decisively to refute an. 17 0 obj <>stream Ist gerechtfertigte, wahre Überzeugung Wissen?" S believes P 3. Three cases to motivate the question and Gettier's conclusion. S tem člankom pa je nastal tudi slavni Gettierjev problem, ki je še danes aktualen v epistemologiji YSq@DIU8)m_H)gO2Y;%Q#f96(W-8XB(tp`MKh.?MH(JnpI[\2n@4RBT(j``6"Q@m6N9bc&KbdHb+fPaX,1Vo1WoJST63k,.hTuNK--1!Uj#M?f-C4%!ThH&.LVPKoqW@B`bPAhXGu$MJL`j@8%*qP'`"ahgQ<0kr&@+k_/lP&naEuXg6NlA]EHn!*R$F3k-bDh+-L)Lm:fRlP.-[.VSfe;Wmj!N%VAN:o8eq^CX+R>Y'M\m'n0Z;ROR&=o3sGF9'<0B)rsVn*%;XmocjFX_BUR*?It9YX]8]R==T12W6REo'[I#cmke##'/@s^L*)[>^sp88[`MZo1KaB!#$CT12mkN?HPDW#VV7QCQ1GYPE*H!k2/&S0*N;@Fl4kBNlM=^q)Ec5%W%/&;Wg9RSa_?'Varr#NX8G0a#tUPDf8W;c>eAn$K4YST&m4W[4SrGnorG'aD\.*8]BGJhDan8c(qXF1,Z`!op8N*#d7"qmA_2uT]QoZ&tHr<9@td$hlu*?]C$%2K&a4fJJEe+%4bajSWrXZN"tFB)=m(XR,FV2`c'6@KPsu_lKY2'TD-?Dd2.IS=Rk\AUu7m>`c'6@KPsu_lKY1(Y@+HGSc@t)0DMf5eQ9Xq?'XW&`E--uY58r@?%'? From Analysis 23 ( 1963): 121-123. (The Macat Library) (English Edition) eBook: Jason Schukraft: Amazon.de: Kindle-Shop Knowledge from, Edmund Gettier 's Argument That Justified True Belief. Gettier's own examples are evidence of knowledge being justified true beliefs. Nowhere did Gettier actually prove that b is not knowledge. These two examples show that definition (a) does not state a szflcient condition for someone's knowing a given proposition. Edmund Gettier’s argument that justified true belief is not a sufficient definition for knowledge is correct. Plato first introduces this concept of knowledge in Thaeaetetus where he presents knowledge, to be justified true belief. von Jason Schukraft als Download. Edmund Gettier S know P iff 1. !r@80Q. 5 0 obj<>/Font<>>> It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. According to Gettier, is justified true belief knowledge? However, he randomly creates, Do justification, belief and trust really describe knowledge? von Edmund L. Gettier versandkostenfrei bestellen bei Weltbild.de, Ihrem Bücher-Spezialisten! endobj (1963) zwei "Gettier-Fälle", in denen das Subjekt zwar die wahre, gerechtfertigte Meinung besitzt, dass p, jedoch nicht weiß, dass p. Daraus schlussfolgerte er, dass die Standardanalyse des Wissens nicht hinreichend sein kann. L’introduction de la notion de croyance ne me semble pas poser de problème. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? », Analysis 23, 1963). Gb"/id;fCLN^NdF5FoH`;SLu:!D#hq0&^Ya#rmIja_]6"o?Yt;e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`4#e^`2MR=;2-QnB:o)Pb?!WH@kmnKmoLN%bF*7?FUcQ3,OS]UsgPo?&dG"%i"9_q6-slqY!_Cg\J%Uo(r'0Q[LaheQ%Io=+#/`mCHZpe^_.pgV3g2+8j%AlKT;ls1C:>MnUMnUYg&%+Ug!U&MOTV^$8"#^lf*a2SJ'pC3L@S>2h1(o/;gQ")rIP[eVIK^Y;2O>b1[,$tQQ0b#,CaG""@i*-B\V#e15;%kb0C=]#>4ke1Ii`o6']LYp3*kpI=*Mh$jo>-H"AW/Na$I8G^FTOjRo0o-=aM1U2`=77iaCm`@]0uNJV;;@6SO]7@+0-[^P1H,gQRLO/?s*g2>=uR8ni+6rM+KJ!Wq(lg[5qEoHSLerO(=:o4ILm>YB;@P91&%q;PbV7p5J,o(BPQgKGSf='pl#m@s[8YA8@;?mI.>48Bl`&jbZb=_L(=q-A?dNDK!flcFto&D6?\S[nP#UH&6SFq=?\K,F>JMqn.3?TU'dnC.V;2TA.B-buf7JEs1H]AW5rC#c$4F@3KJ=WCo]RJ3rVp.R&B"@UtH2K[4HBY=%EPD*qTdGKD7n/n@`GOi=OFe=^N-nFj*UY,"apV*d8F9i@]F[#d2Z6k,"9TVbBrjPR0kQe)L(F9(&L8]>\'SEUJ&,t[$sP)&6:K_Hf>(CfK4]M85J4W.<4iqf]Me;3h1G,8p4S3b=b23[EPYXGVX2)8hDtGDd0f9;p1e,I(L]4X)54N&71oI\Y5,uX:!u5cRSNQ&u+#4%o_,4?T/Uo/,:f1"l[W`oId-q\=Jr^N(-#`#d8-U]Mc-M9\BN3LFgb$`8K5LT;IN9&3ML;IngP]h/IY9A0i)?b"rIQm^Z#E(feI3>r7/k@I4(*$,W_^0!F?FP5M@IRoG(UGKe9/[BOk[,D[>jej$'q)--;+@ZkdZBTK1Gij/8ASL%Wau_FpBf>L5(a'B%,4'k_tb,D*OQl,G9gtKt#]D7#06V.2F9YMUD&cV=Qf4657_5PTP)okTnp=m;],`Xra=NY91mfGU7%THt%H/5pAAG9Q#^1[LAj"HfXRtO9G3EX+8Lh>@eD[C\_Mcu,lkY8@p*&6l6Y"Q'eZ#iP5n`h`gQLQa;RLCs-b60lIo;A8g.,GAb(nFmYBSL'bJk-4^WiNo'rD[#_n0=Lo7HJs6jFOL;tUml?7\!N)M':YVEXf?&="lYZ'p$Ldn4p#9!eLQf.ArVt*cqOisDlO/U,rt]*_WOEn.Nh^LQU-[h2Pb=co&kl>8\mn*k`uabCDnCO*o;?3rfZ)R8`[=^7oGi<53&\\B!K[?JQjJbd=c_fB-i\#$c5t>Vb4qRR!Us'=k4N][QKfP.Yol==c*nE0p`^]$GmU^-V7cBRX7.dQK0^@bN3m'ik/!O+pCW`-&-u&n73)O9l[k\#`m-LP5HVO\\-GH8T0fhRVY45+i%2[%1N[KcU*`['=o7WenalTAU:@a!5Y[(7^8hs*PSodnV4b#ZRgD/7GP#ma3H4-!!0#cRFV&1n]"QB/'HogK;)*E1%]tT69,d/4AARbj\;@7O.kt>5_q5b]$h^#`7ftUc]9mB+o-#H(Y#V'b'A%YsD.E!+H=D"WW^UHcpih4]$GuC#eD(Jn&[`5i9?%eOP'>$0fK)tHhu,iO:dI8_!+j>$?6_L!;i9Ug+BDcq]mS=n.Di$G>dE67\*Q)&.jD7Y5jOBL69tQZPG?a=f,]\A8X5`Q,U!Q"7MO+,4Bh3Z'-0i/.ZA1bTqZZ]"qDJTqN9A:?&=X.!QCm$+?K)JUMIOq:S!?5c*e0AKus+M;]%3JG%K*!%uG-;Y^c92@Fmj%3]B`[t$i%#N?pfKD[4+?XAY8#o)?&PE?r[;k:A)*CKF+Amh!N_(HH*B$U=.`bBm9"S)CEq?,[XhrH/7#u=;9G1`i,f(=ZSr&dk7hD9!;l@f+Ea-DH;,t!4:QX*]@gS;T$g7.U]W=,Fn>)V[?A;9sK5;Ej7'#?!ZQp09hk2`:iT]3).:SqmI-lGpS.ZKrbuR$!2hF=8,Is0Ek!bA.mk4@,.EJ.:0`J2PP+(K)VG!aV&BDk1-*`^tMS8W-rHIdY_5/(m3EBBTC0E-1B6YFH2CpHF<9OgtY=g;H"lXaCNks\YI>N6^b[%C(0[n"Q($!u.P$.S-7*V/I#gYSENY0)O;V?*DdEtkn`J2JMRCe/K:ut7g&l5c4OC,#u4C`1KYA1C$ac:g##Se:j.fAN1lK"$EcOq`WEM+G%Alp,>NN$7Vd[*0IaUMtt`J1V`YD^g\;C>sV.#=+8OZe7_U6kE[qKa6:P&YqB]6@+;A8u_!;S&"7."'#bJVbK&qLHT8U.JZ6e3,ss$]K/p?!fnZL9Yb8(HQu(:-)ib11o^;#'.JXig*8.3X.iAr_S]plG6k?a(goWE;Q;AjQ4t:30F"MI+u#?s#7A=$2sCug10#:KDJ,&qoF(/kQP7%5&0?1A&,"2/'?5/SZ[K(u-9diQ4=^[j/K'V2GKB9d)(tZ/r&NiCB3,feEl,>HK^IU$8`":D@i>[544NFSto9)nHOpco5"sBU)Klp$Li!d5^Y+]B7_8=4mCu:am2MJFdY>l^BiLP]*#GqI+Zg@Y0-?"Aa6^HLiA'ZoZ40PQr!Rm!g@#[]kQ(SQmKq*$r\pXW"9L?Si[HG7,5F`#XRKrfdDEN'(C;Sc>b4g_VCAj(]dbrL0(t8)O*,QJ/b5Zd`A'a%H#aq"6I4a2'lTNr4%SAYr)Ui>dc'cV[9\6_Y;hT*O5kGNL/hk5$h>ZHI2o'J]t19JZ3l2sW@-"jV_LHj*:U&"nUY,LJSB`KRTq#ts+MCFdNPdAUKK[9"HS1&Hm*`>i"rqP5Y$;^D"gHIjEIm$(1Rt`C/jG+c7JC6XH/^BI*>?m>HcN:^Cr\g2(OmqAqh-W@RM&WnG$c5OW$TCrO#16FK+d;'^>b?aN.=%qGHb3#fg624A9Gn>A8N',1E#\1#5_lAr[]]H!SeFW3qm0bq+n9gVH)kC[l,Gnir97kKdcVB@/+ck8o#)'/*KHY5#9iRM(GWKLP'Q#P;$WXBXhG#k2!Ns[Q>gon5uDr-f,k)7$5ED#VQ0iH%+RCaL1W_I9&$Gp`If]:@#e96Hlir`%8*#FZDmuqsoP$R?(G$^8[:WN8MW]McXe5hU_hVK/Cb#KJQb1&Gj>U9[5h/WFK9n]Wd5G__,9NYb%=Bo=fM:s*Ymu?qr>m#W$\7b!UpT=+I+o*?$02gnqYAC"Y6ZrjSgKOhCj;i];e1AHBRj)V'IX8`f2pNlpYA#>p*,i/+It">lRp)LqPItrep7pe+d2"Cs=\1K7TnR;Q"Q>OpGn.*QD-h6;UV;Q$ZM#3EDRCp3M1o>-"QAsIjlI6AcHT-jQk^Q@&$u&oC)m*GX*e%hhWm-k&3dX,Q+S_DEQNnr&nAhRg)62o)5Yp=D&Nf(2VjRVNeY[e^gR,#h8:dUa&3'e,4hJ+Js6>Anlj>S?aC8[qJ#*7GN]fc"#-)F/nG/5>RnD6u0C5U`DEif"'GV%`IN?A3=Cu_7IrVnYpj:]?\3(FP:=G]Z[;G1$X"X(K_-)ehlahDLa"8g[f"*-sWd1-lO=!s0,Af89s`_-8LfLi/8Gl5%C`sB4ZPFiAGnbS>8!Zib"_fD_Z?F>Bi`$pYW[;=$.kYTo/3mXkCFD+F$7L?s'E=?iei!O1b*D7KMW>D@nI`kC;"kCQd,[%o@O&Mn^_XhaUEN7q(/@\A&=msV;Ya8Nor@O7EZ31Z?5XSk2>_04'(Z^@pGiD]='r,81MW@UgCC-4#/WmCE!=j"40YC[jZ)7oF_dtr%@.=uLb/6#I/.%In1;ELJWB0tCU1=Y&D5#;f^bi23gMD+*T4k_#F!f5*fMVXS3?cBrZJPGbT1oXR^-h2U+o-B6frs96mD9FSYn?r-MXf#pOgbro+[uGcW7`BO%:nP0qG$!DPUu%f/PZhq).k&NoQ;DM5K``DmNSF*!?C[>jU@k=If):=k.r#iCgWK;PR4NKTeMmm'h20P:F0pY_nN9Er'IZ2a2TUD#&e7Gr;TIW+@X5(J+TpHXo*Et/"b\=[S0Jc5Pe"]`j)e#nAuK'Y7iF8SXW8+*kZf*;R0RM(h%sX-%?kA_\B5)nB#Y=#6FFoe\;TV'H\WI^%R)C2kZ*#\atpZYa2bDJQ-\&VN)X`Z$OAHcB-MDHqV8E@I:#GtNI9"#a90)4lf9LBta92VPYYSq@DIU8)m_H)gO2Y;%Q#f96(W-8XB(tp`MKh.?MH(JnpI[\2n@4RBT(j``6"Q@m6N9bc&KbdHb+fPaX,1Vo1WoJST63k,.hTuNK--1!Uj#M?f-C4%!ThH&.LVPKoqW@B`bPAhXGu$MJL`j@8%*qP'`"ahgQ<0kr&@+k_/lP&naEuXg6NlA]EHn!*R$F3k-bDh+-L)Lm:fRlP.-[.VSfe;Wmj!N%VAN:o8eq^CX+R>Y'M\m'n0Z;ROR&=o3sGF9'<0B)rsVn*%;XmocjFX_BUR*?It9YX]8]R==T12W6REo'[I#cmke##'/@s^L*)[>^sp88[`MZo1KaB!#$CT12mkN?HPDW#VV7QCQ1GYPE*H!k2/&S0*N;@Fl4kBNlM=^q)Ec5%W%/&;Wg9RSa_?'Varr#NX8G0a#tUPDf8W;c>eAn$K4YST&m4W[4SrGnorG'aD\.*8]BGJhDan8c(qXF1,Z`!op8N*#d7"qmA_2uT]QoZ&tHr<9@td$hlu*?]C$%2K&a4fJJEe+%4bajSWrXZN"tFB)=m(XR,FV2`c'6@KPsu_lKY2'TD-?Dd2.IS=Rk\AUu7m>`c'6@KPsu_lKY1(Y@+HGSc@t)0DMf5eQ9Xq?'XW&`E--uY58r@?%'?!r@80Q.q?'/I4jqm2BV#,fO\UsZFZ!@#5>\0),@+U"e`j9$lL[hQ=/0p7"%>76dacl]Sc1m::60MYlb;KcmJeF@bo*5%^U=3#hAeK;I3GCcA2A9LDtEpr-8Z#[R<6[*nO@k3?V6rObt3YgWN:Mr_l[9i1ZX6GmX1Rc#bINu^&]0.bY^mZN.Z,nM#41N&$?s@%$U&KO0\d(D^r1B\PkNg^h-,O9_t@E!2(=,b5^C0"[gO38&pec]%&WnS\?I1Agf#UoKW"ND_$fF8&pec]%&Wn*PEV_@+D?cj,G(T&$3qIe7,JnjXE7=\i/'eI^ZLsoRU#q*aEOS[ld!TMKe-I5lRUuj'X1ABBNIs+ck"'iZ78TaM3sa*3@*PlrN&Jpq2X=mfW(Kr_h`qYe9AVTtoRS#Yc/0PsK!Y98U^*164V0W1_!I%2kiYK7j-!`8b7poni5na"-drc41da#h<9S4:VRfI]5HOnHuCeZc4ndR--+K*X>n53`M^3/:Y,uD)).S0-qYEj3I]'E8!p&4JO`MPN*qc'DK6C"D`$AaC?WC[5j[6bAiL>M+:l\$$OmFc;;?Xc-cMnQHPe0pj8\UeQM(qIi_7A;;/Pegug6(h[;T'P]7bMeJlLVD;Kq>F>/#.qQu#kKuof+TBcqoPd[^1-TW*X+ar'3[)1nKci3/5l(bUo$?`1td2UM(]gXkLM>u8>K(jl^F'_=Pdj_)FK?SV!DN$(FJWE7LmD!]I[Df-#D>sj7!>H1phbEZ^%1;n(X+j$Os^_+gn!